DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2013-00493
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT: X
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show he was issued a letter of non-availability by competent authority in conjunction with his permanent change of station (PCS) from Vance Air Force Base (AFB), Oklahoma to Little Rock AFB, Arkansas under Special Order AF-128994, dated 21 August 2012, and in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume 1, Paragraph U5320-D.1, be reimbursed his actual costs in the amount of $4,226.32 for his personally procured move (PPM).
Members of the Board considered this application on 29 October 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Ltr, PPA HQ/ECAF, dtd 11 Mar 13
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00200
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00493 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00493
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00493 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: X Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00200
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00493 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01953
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date of the order assigning him from Kunsan Air Base, Korea, to Dover Air Force Base (AFB), Delaware (DE) be changed from 30 August 2012 to 20 July 2012 so he can receive reimbursement for moving his family and household goods (HHG) from Virginia (VA) to Delaware (DE). Amended Order AG-033513, dated 11 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Station Where Separated reflected in Block 8b of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 12 Aug 13, be changed to read Travis AFB, CA. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 currently reflects JBSA Randolph AFB, TX in Block 8b, but he served his full term and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03724
AFBCMR BC-2012-03724 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05852
Recommend the Board change the applicants DAS to SJAFB to reflect 28 May 13 since this is the day the Join Spouse assignment was approved by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) and also this is the day the applicant was officially assigned to SJAFB. AFMAN 65-116V1, Defense Joint Military Pay System Active Component (DJMS-AC) FSO Procedures, paragraph 41.2.3.1.2.2. states If the member takes leave in the local area of the new PDS (Permanent Duty Station) without contacting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05923
AFBCMR BC-2012-05923 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03119
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03119 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Term of Enlistment (TOE) for his 26 September 2008 reenlistment be considered as five years and nine weeks rather than five years and nine months. Per Air Force guidance, years and months is the only authorized terms of enlistment/reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible to sell 30 days of leave. As of this date, this office has not received a response (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...